Skip to content
FinToolSuite
Updated 2026-09-09 · Savings · Educational use only ·
Privacy

Portfolio Drawdown Calculator

How long a portfolio lasts at a fixed withdrawal and a fixed rate of return.

See how long a portfolio lasts at a fixed annual withdrawal and a fixed expected return, and how far the answer moves with the rate.

What this tool does

This calculator runs a portfolio forward one year at a time, applying an expected return to the balance and taking a fixed withdrawal out at the end of each year, until the balance reaches zero. It reports the number of years that takes, alongside the withdrawal expressed as a percentage of the starting portfolio. Where the return covers the withdrawal, the balance never falls and the result is reported as lasting indefinitely. The answer is far more sensitive to the return than to the size of the pot, because the return works on the whole remaining balance while the withdrawal is a flat amount, and the sensitivity rises sharply as the return approaches the withdrawal rate. The withdrawal is held flat in nominal terms with no inflation adjustment, the return never varies, and the model excludes tax, fees, the order in which returns arrive, and any income arriving from elsewhere.

Quick answer: with the default values, the result is 37 years (Portfolio Lasts). Adjust the values below for your own figures.


Enter Values

People also use

Formula Used
Balance at the end of year k
Starting portfolio value
Fixed amount withdrawn at the end of each year
Expected annual return as a percentage
Expected annual return as a decimal
First year in which the balance reaches zero or below

Disclaimer

Results are estimates for educational purposes only. They do not constitute financial advice. Consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions.

How long the money lasts

A 500,000 portfolio paying out 30,000 a year and growing at 5% lasts 37 years on this model. Drop the return to 4% and it lasts 29 years; at 3% it lasts 24. The pot and the withdrawal have not moved. Only the assumption has, and it is the one number in the calculation nobody can check in advance.

Why the return assumption dominates

The reason the return dominates is that it works on the whole remaining balance while the withdrawal is a flat amount. Early on, 5% of 500,000 is 25,000 against a 30,000 draw, so the balance falls slowly. As it falls, the growth falls with it and the same 30,000 takes a larger bite, which is why depletion accelerates rather than running at a steady pace.

The point where growth matches the draw

There is a point where the two cancel out. At the defaults the withdrawal is exactly 6% of the portfolio, so a 6% return covers the draw precisely and the balance never moves: the tool reports Forever. That is a knife edge rather than a comfortable margin. At 5.99% the same portfolio lasts 110 years, at 5.9% it lasts 72, and at 5% it lasts 37. The word Forever appears the moment the return reaches the withdrawal rate and not a fraction before it, so a result sitting near that boundary is far more fragile than it looks.

What a flat withdrawal misses

The withdrawal is flat in nominal terms, which is the model's largest simplification. A retirement drawing the same figure in year one and year thirty is drawing far less in real terms by the end, and this calculation makes no adjustment for that. The BIS maintains consumer price series for more than 60 countries, some running back to the mid-19th century, which is where a sense of how far prices drift comes from. Raising the withdrawal each year to keep pace would shorten every figure on this page.

The return is also a single fixed number, which no portfolio delivers. Long-run returns are measured asset by asset and country by country rather than as one figure: a dataset covering 16 advanced economies from 1870 to 2015 assembles total returns for equity, housing, bonds and bills. Separately from that evidence on levels, the order in which returns arrive matters as well as their average, since a poor run early in a drawdown takes its losses from a larger balance than the same run later would. This model has no ordering at all, so it cannot show that effect.

What the calculator leaves out

  • Inflation, so the withdrawal stays flat in nominal terms and shrinks in real ones
  • The order returns arrive in, which a single fixed rate cannot represent
  • Tax on withdrawals, and where the portfolio is held
  • Platform, fund and adviser fees, which come off the return
  • Any change in the withdrawal, whether chosen or forced
  • State or workplace pension income arriving partway through

For educational illustration only

This calculator runs one balance forward at one fixed rate, taking one fixed amount out each year until nothing is left. Every input is held constant for the whole period. The output is a single arithmetic path, useful for seeing how sensitive the answer is to the return assumed, rather than a projection of how a drawdown would actually run.

Example Scenario

A portfolio of $500,000 paying out $30,000 a year at 5% growth lasts 37 years. The withdrawal is flat in nominal terms and the return never varies.

Inputs

Portfolio Value:$500,000
Annual Withdrawal:$30,000
Expected Return:5%
Expected Result37 years
Expected Result breakdown
Withdrawal Rate6.00%
Expected Return5.00%
Initial Portfolio$500,000.00
Annual Withdrawal$30,000.00

This example uses sample figures for illustration. Adjust the inputs above to match a specific situation and see how the result changes.

Sources & Methodology

Methodology

The calculator steps the balance forward one year at a time: it grows the balance by the expected return, subtracts the fixed withdrawal, and counts the year, stopping when the balance reaches zero or below. The count is therefore in whole years, and the figure shown is the first year in which the portfolio is exhausted rather than an exact depletion date part way through a year. The run stops at 200 years if the balance has not reached zero by then, and the result is reported as lasting indefinitely when the balance at the end of the run is at least the starting value, which happens once the return covers the withdrawal. That threshold is a knife edge rather than a margin: at the default inputs the withdrawal is exactly 6% of the starting portfolio, so 6% returns indefinitely while 5.99% returns 110 years and 5.999% returns 150. The withdrawal is held flat in nominal terms, so no inflation adjustment is applied and the real value of the draw falls across the period. The model applies one constant return with no variation and no ordering, so sequence-of-returns effects are absent, and it excludes tax, platform and fund fees, changes in the withdrawal, and any income from outside the portfolio.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this the 4% rule?
They are related but not the same thing. A safe withdrawal rate is derived from historical sequences of returns, testing how a portfolio would have fared across many different starting years. This calculator applies one constant return instead, so it produces a single clean path rather than a distribution of outcomes. The constant-return version is easier to read and more optimistic in character, because it removes the bad sequences that do the damage in the historical work.
How much does the return assumption matter?
More than anything else in the calculation. At the defaults, 3% gives 24 years, 4% gives 29, 5% gives 37, and 6% never depletes at all. The effect is not linear either: the closer the return gets to the withdrawal rate, the faster the number climbs, so the same one-point change is worth a few years at the bottom of the range and decades near the top.
What about sequence of returns risk?
It is outside the model entirely. A drawdown that meets poor returns early takes those losses from a larger balance, and the withdrawals that follow come out of a pot that has already shrunk, so the same set of returns in a different order produces a different outcome. A single fixed rate has no order, so nothing here can show that. The figures on this page describe the smooth case rather than the range of cases.
What if the withdrawal is flexible?
The calculator holds it fixed, so a plan that varies with markets is not what is being modelled. Reducing withdrawals in poor years leaves more capital invested to recover, and the arithmetic of that is visible here in a rough way: rerunning the calculation at a lower withdrawal shows how much longer the portfolio lasts. What the tool cannot do is decide when a year counts as poor enough to cut.

Related Calculators

More Savings Calculators

Explore Other Financial Tools

Spotted something off?

Calculations or display — let us know.